[Return to ENG 510 Course Overview]
This is Bob Broad’s evaluation of the semester’s coursework completed by:
(student’s name) ________________________________________
Date of evaluation: _________________________
To help you learn and improve your work, I have already commented substantially on your projects during the semester. In this summary evaluation I will provide only brief comments--if any--on your work. My job at this point is to judge your work against the standards we have developed within our course and that I have developed during my years teaching these methods courses.
At this time, I am looking mainly for two things: changes in your work since I last saw it (e.g., all evidence of your writing process on major projects, new journal entries) and a sense of how your work looks all collected in your portfolio and considered as a final and whole product. I will read the contents of your portfolio and judge each of the major elements as falling into one of five categories of quality. I use a number to represent each category of judgment: 4 = “Excellent, Outstanding”; 3 = “Good, Impressive”; 2 = “Adequate, Satisfactory”; 1 = “Poor, Unsatisfactory”; 0 (zero) = “No Credit.” (Note also the correspondence between these numbers and the letter grades listed below.)
The final grade I assign to your work in the course records my synthesis of the judgments I make concerning the major elements of your work in the course. Here is the meaning that each letter grade carries for me:
A “Outstanding, excellent.” Your work shows exceptional strengths and few or no major weaknesses.
B “Good.” Your work shows significant strengths, and/or its strengths are offset by some significant weaknesses.
C “Adequate, satisfactory.” The strengths and weaknesses of your work are roughly equally balanced. (Please note: the grade of C does not mean “average”; it is most likely neither the mean, the median, nor the mode of the grades I will give.)
D “Poor.” I find more significant weaknesses in your work than I do strengths.
F “Failing.” Your work does not meet my minimum expectations for work in this course, and does not therefore merit credit for the course.
|
|
Process (50%) |
Product (50%) |
Combined Grade |
Notes |
|
Internship Proposal r Classroom Research OR r Course design and teaching |
|
|
|
|
|
Teaching Philosophy OR Course Design |
|
|
|
|
|
Comps Reading List and Overview |
|
|
|
|
|
Response Journal |
|
|
||
|
Class Participation (Including preparation, attendance, listening,
speaking, and class presentations) |
|
|
||
|
Other Portfolio Materials (Including Preface, process documentation, responses
to and support of others’ work, and organization of portfolio) |
|
|
||
Grade for the course: __________
C:\Teaching\510\Portfolio Evaluation Sheet.doc