POLITICAL SCIENCE 334:
THE POLITICS OF RACE, ETHNICITY AND INEQUALITY

 

REGGIENET:
The Politics Of Race, Ethnicity, And Inequality (POL 334 sec.001)

Gary Klass
gmklass@ilstu.edu

Since its founding, no set of political issues has more bedeviled the American political system than those having to do with race and ethnicity. The nation’s founders devised a political system that has done a pretty good job of addressing conflicts arising from ideological, geographic, religious and class differences, but the institutions they created have been largely inept when it comes to dealing with the persistent inequalities related to race and ethnicity. Social policy problems related to education, crime, and welfare, that might otherwise find resolution, often prove unsolvable to the extent race and ethnicity enter into the debates.  How and whether or not the nation can begin to solve these problems are the fundamental questions of this course.
At its simplest level, much of the debate over race in the US is between those who see racism as the fundamental cause of America's social ills and those who blame these problems on the behavior and lifestyle of the disadvantaged themselves.  Starting with either of these first two premises -- and in some cases, compromises between the two premises -- those how have studied and written books on race in America have developed a wide range of competing theories, and agendas.
In this course we will read many of these books, analyze and critique them. We will read the books in part for the knowledge and information they might contain, but mostly to gain an understanding of the diversity of thinking about these matters. An important objective of this course is for the students to develop an ability to communicate their own ideas and insights about these most controversial of subjects. This involves more than formulating ideas and putting them on paper; it involves finding an audience, exposing one's ideas, evidence, and logic to others and anticipating, and responding to, their reactions. In this regard, this course will be different.
Perhaps unlike many other courses related to race, ethnicity and social inequality, there will be no attempt to impose any doctrine, perspective or ideology on this course (although even saying that might do so), other than that we ought to adhere to common standards of free and open inquiry. The books themselves have been chosen to reflect a very broad spectrum of thought and ideology. The authors, the other students in the class, and, perhaps, the instructor will, no doubt, express views with which you will disagree. This should be appreciated: you will never learn much from people you agree with. Our discussions will be guided by one general rule:

 

We are all students trying to learn; it is just as important not to take offense
as it is not to offend.
Course Objectives:
        To familiarize students with the broad spectrum of contemporary political debate about matters of race and ethnicity
        To understand how ideas about race and ethnicity shape social policy.
        To engage in critical analysis of ideological positions and policy agendas related to ethnic issues
        To develop habits and interests in reading good books.
        To develop capacities to express ideas and insights about matters of race and ethnicity in public fora

Due Dates, Requirements and Grades.

Reviews. Each (undergraduate) student will be assigned to read four of the books (one from each of the four sections of the course), to summarize the work in class, and to submit a review of each book to the ReggieNet Discussions forum. Graduate student must complete an additional assignment.  

Each reviewer will be asked to summarize and discuss the assigned book as part of a group presentation on the assigned date. The review will not receive a grade higher than a B if a) it is submitted late, or b) if the reviewer cannot adequately summarize the book the prior week. Each review will be evaluated based on the "Summary Grade sheet" standards.  For the reviews, each review will count for 20% of your final grade.  Note that the class presentation on each book is a part of the grade for participation.

The class presentations should be organized around the main ideas in the book, with more than one student addressing the same ideas; they should not be organized as chapter-by-chapter summaries.  As a general rule one student should summarize what the book says, the remaining students should critique, defend, analyze and interpret.  The latter reviews should draw connections between the book and other books reviewed or discussed in class.
You are welcome to send draft copies of your other reviews to the instructor and to each other at any time, but please do so sufficiently in advance of the due date to receive comments back.  Not paying attention to comments made on your draft is a big mistake.
Class participation, both oral in-class participation in class (including serving as the lead reviewer) and on the discussion list, will comprise 5 percent of the grade.  In-class participation will be graded on a 5-point scale and will be based on book presentations and include at least two well-thought-out messages to the discussion list commenting on other reviews that have been posted. At least one of these must be posted before fall break  Such commentaries should consist of serious analysis of the book or the review under discussion. At all times avoid sending quick, short, and immediate responses to reviews and commentaries to the list. Those who hardly ever say anything in class will get a 0 or 1.
Exam.   There will be one take home exam, 15% of the grade based on one of these two exam questions (use link on on-line syllabus).  The exam will be an approximately 3 single-spaced pages. It must be sent to the instructor by email by December 17 (or the date of the final exam).
Format.  In the class schedule below, two books are assigned each Wednesday and Thursday class. The reviews must be posted to the discussion list the following Sunday at midnight (except the first week's books which should be posted before class on Tuesday, May 29).
Attendance: Attendance for this course is mandatory. Do not enroll in the course if you anticipate problems attending class.   If for any reason at all you miss two classes, you will be assigned an extra review*.  One more class, one more review**.  If you miss a class when you are scheduled to present a book, you must also schedule a special meeting with the instructor as soon as possible.
 
Course Schedule:
I. Introduction:  (Three weeks)
II. Reviews
SECTION ONE
Sept 10, 12 (reviews due Sept 16)
Joe Feagin. Racist America 
John McWhorter. Losing the Race: Self-Sabotage in Black America

 
Sept 17, 19 (reviews due Sept 23)
Derrick Bell,Faces at the Bottom of the Well
Mona Charen, Do-Gooders: How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help 

 
SECTION TWO  
Sept 24
Eugene Robinson, Disintegration: The Splintering of Black America
Michael Eric Dyson, Is Bill Cosby Right?: Or Has the Black Middle Class Lost its Mind?

Oct 1
Michelle Alexander, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness 
Charles Murray, Coming Apart, The State of White America

Oct 8

Richard Thompson Ford The Race Card: How Bluffing About Bias Makes Race Relations Worse
Randall Kennedy, The Persistence of the Color Line: Racial Politics and the Obama Presidency
(this one is tentative – I’m waiting for a better book on Obama)
SECTION THREE
Oct 15
Fergus Bordewich, Killing the White Man's Indian
Frank H. Wu., Yellow: Race in America, Beyond Black and White

 
Oct 22
Samuel Huntington, Who Are We: The Challenges to America's National Identity
Roberto Suro, Strangers Among Us: Latino Lives in a Changing America

Oct 29
Sharon Hays Flat Broke with Children: Women in the Age of Welfare Reform  
Geneive Abdo
, Mecca and Main Street: Muslim Life in America after 9/11..

 
SECTION FOUR
Nov 5
Jonathan Kozol, The Shame of the Nation: 
Richard Rothstein, Class and Schools

 
Nov 12
Stephan and Abigail Thernstrom. No Excuses: Closing the Racial Gap in Learning
Dinesh D'Souza, Illiberal Education: The Politics of Race and Sex on Campus

 
Nov 26
Urofsky, Melvin, Affirmative Action On Trial
Barbara A. Perry, The Michigan Affirmative Action Cases
 


 http://lilt.ilstu.edu/gmklass/pos334/sylFal1.gifprinted on virgin rainforest paper