|
Before giving students First-Order
and Second-Order
documents, the teacher needs to raise a question that
is of historical importance -- one that poses a central
problem and piques students' curiosity, giving purpose
to their examination of the sources.
Discussions have an aim which is to come to a consensus
of the meaning of the document, while initially suspending
judgment. The teacher asks questions that are prefaced
by "what," "how," and "why."
Deliberative
discussion is the heart of the discussion process.
The Analysis Guides provide a framework for thinking
historically. The Analysis Guides emphasize what historians
look for and think about as they analyze a document.
They are not intended as a checklist or a worksheet.
Instead, they focus a direction for discussion of the
credibility of historical evidence and historical understanding.
Create
a context
Use a guide that emphasizes:
Sourcing
Heuristic what historians do before reading
for content comprehension
Corroboration Heuristic what historians
do to relate one document to another document
Contextualization historians describe
the time frame and conditions both locally and nationally
Comparative historians describe conditions
in other parts of the world at the time
The
terminology above is drawn from Sam Wineburg, a cognitive
studies researcher whose focus is the discipline of
history.
For
further study, consult:
Wineburg,
Sam. Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts:
Charting the Future of Teaching the Past. Philadelphia:
Temple University, 2001.
Wineburg,
Samuel S. "Historical Problem Solving: A Study
of Cognitive Processes Used in the Evaluation of Documentary
and Pictorial Evidence." Journal of Educational
Psychology 83 (1991): 73-87.
Wineburg,
Samuel S. "Probing the Depths of Students' Historical
Knowledge." Perspectives: Newsletter of the
American Historical Association 30 (1992): 20-24.
Wineburg,
Sam. "Reading Abraham Lincoln: An Expert/Expert
Study in the Interpretation of Historical Texts,"
Congitive Science 22, no. 3 (1998): 319-346.
|